HDTV hmm harley d +tv? What?

Connect this stunt HDTV by broadband to my pc by wifi or what? Nada a chance..

My time is not any nano speeeed montecarlo game.. as my emails capito?

 

What is needed than to have fun…????  Does it exist…? Fun do… but the honest healthdeclaration in the IT and electronics industry does not, is that not a time for that..?

 

A switch,  a backdoor channel to transport info popup ads etc ,  blocking functionality and also to take out messages (theft) etc.., and more over to understand what the viewers see on the dear tv and computer  so dear…

 

All this letters? To look on tv? And hook it up to my lappy? Odd? Just gobbeligoktext to hide “the art of painting in business itself in the corner” due to the need to pump up figures in bookkeeping and more blocki stuffi etc… aaaaany question? just a simple email kajander1@nodns.org

 

DDCP in or DHCP? Hmm

Encryption?

H.264 mpeg 4 AVC or SMPTE VC-1

Market 45 miljon hdtv sets in 2008? Que?

720p and 1080i signals?

 

Lets understand (as usual..) backdoor pump in out popup take email etc stunt possible?

Mpeg 2 backdoor stunt is know as most of the rest…

 

http://www.packetizer.com/codecs/h264/trev_293-schaefer.pdf

Control data aha…

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264

H.264, MPEG-4 Part 10, or AVC, for Advanced Video Coding, is a digital video codec standard which is noted for achieving very high data compression. It was written by the ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG) together with the ISO/IE

C

 Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) as the product of a collective partnership effort known as the Joint Video Team (JVT). The ITU-T H.264 standard and the ISO/IEC MPEG-4 Part 10 standard (formally, ISO/IEC 14496-10) are technically identical. The final drafting work on the first version of the standard was completed in May of 2003’

It is usual to call the standard as H.264/AVC (or AVC/H.264 or H.264/MPEG-4 AVC or MPEG-4/H.264 AVC) to emphasize the common heritage

 

The intent of the H.264/AVC project was to create a standard that would be capable of providing good video quality at bit rates that are substantially lower (e.g., half or less) than what previous standards would need (e.g., relative to MPEG-2, H.263, or MPEG-4 Part 2), and to do so without so much of an increase in complexity as to make the design impractical (excessively expensive) to implement. An additional goal was to do this in a flexible way that would allow the standard to be applied to a very wide variety of applications (e.g., for both low and high bit rates, and low and high resolution video) and to work well on a very wide variety of networks and systems (e.g., for broadcast, DVD storage, RTP/IP packet networks, and ITU-T multimedia telephony systems).

 

Ok

http://www.packetizer.com/codecs/h264/trev_293-schaefer.pdf

The H.264/AVC design [2] supports the coding of video (in 4:2:0 chroma format) that contains either progressive

or interlaced frames, which may be mixed together in the same sequence.

 

Generally, a frame of video contains two interleaved fields, the top and the bottom field.

 

The two fields of an interlaced frame, which are separated in time by a field period (half the time of a frame period), may be coded separately as two field pictures or together as a frame picture. A progressive frame should always be coded as a single frame picture; however, it is still considered to consist of two fields at the same instant in time.

 

 

The JVT recently completed the development of some extensions to the original standard that are known as the Fidelity Range Extensions (FRExt). These extensions support higher-fidelity video coding by supporting increased sample accuracy (including 10-bit and 12-bit coding) and higher-resolution color information (including sampling structures known as YUV 4:2:2 and YUV 4:4:4).  Hmm 2bits on the loose?

Several other features are also included in the Fidelity Range Extensions project (such as adaptive switching between 4×4 and 8×8 integer transforms, encoder-specified perceptual-based quantization weighting matrices, efficient inter-picture lossless coding, support of additional color spaces, and a residual color transform).

http://www.packetizer.com/codecs/h264/trev_293-schaefer.pdf

The remaining two slice types are SP (switching P) and SI (switching I), which are specified for efficient switching between bitstreams coded at various bit-rates

 

The Inter prediction signals of the bitstreams for one selected SP frame are quantized in the transform domain, forcing them into a coarser range of amplitudes.

This coarser range of amplitudes permits a low bit-rate coding of the difference signal between the bitstreams. SI frames are specified to achieve a perfect match for SP frames in cases where Inter prediction cannot be used

because of transmission errors.

 

http://www.packetizer.com/codecs/h264/trev_293-schaefer.pdf

Which pictures are actually located in each reference picture buffer is an issue for the

multi-picture buffer control, and an operation very similar to the well-known MPEG-2 B pictures can be enabled.

 

Man, here I found a guy in Rethymno Crete over a beer taking about this, cheeseslices

 

The motion vector coding

is similar to that of P slices with the appropriate modifications because neighbouring blocks may be coded

using different prediction modes.

 

Rice engraving???

http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/context/80207/0

 

 

The design work on the Fidelity Range Extensions was completed in July of 2004, and the drafting was finished in September of 2004.

 

 

 

 We need a switch 1 or 0

A NAL unit specifies a generic format for use in both packet-oriented

and bitstream systems.

The format of NAL units for both packet-oriented transport and bitstream delivery is

identical . except that each NAL unit can be preceded by a start code prefix in a bitstream-oriented transport

layer

 

http://www.packetizer.com/codecs/h264/trev_293-schaefer.pdf

a Network Abstraction Layer (NAL), which formats the VCL representation of the video and provides

header information in a manner appropriate for conveyance by particular transport layers or storage media.

 

 

We need a switch 1 or 0

These techniques, along with several others, help H.264 to perform significantly better than any prior standard can, under a wide variety of circumstances in a wide variety of application environments. H.264 can often perform radically better than MPEG-2 video—typically obtaining the same quality at half of the bit rate or less.

Like other ISO/IEC MPEG video standards, H.264/AVC has a reference software implementation that can be freely downloaded. Its main purpose is to give examples of H.264/AVC features, rather than being a useful application per se. (See the links section for a pointer to that software.) Some reference hardware design work is also under way in MPEG.

Profiles

The standard includes the following six sets of capabilities, which are referred to as profiles, targeting specific classes of applications:

 

Baseline

Extended

Main

High

High 10

High 4:2:2

High 4:4:4

I and P Slices

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

B Slices

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

SI and SP Slices

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Multiple Reference Frames

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

In-Loop Deblocking Filter

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

CAVLC Entropy Coding

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

CABAC Entropy Coding

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Flexible Macroblock Ordering (FMO)

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Arbitrary Slice Ordering (ASO)

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Redundant Slices (RS)

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Data Partitioning

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Interlaced Coding (PicAFF, MBAFF)

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

4:2:0 Chroma Format

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Monochrome Video Format (4:0:0)

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

4:2:2 Chroma Format

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

4:4:4 Chroma Format

No

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

8 Bit Sample Depth

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

9 and 10 Bit Sample Depth

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

11 and 12 Bit Sample Depth

No

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

8x8 vs. 4x4 Transform Adaptivity

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Quantization Scaling Matrices

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Separate Cb and Cr QP control

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Residual Color Transform

No

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

Predictive Lossless Coding

No

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

 

Baseline

Extended

Main

High

High 10

High 4:2:2

High 4:4:4

 

 

Since the completion of the original version of the standard in May of 2003, the JVT has also completed two generations of "corrigendum" errata corrections to the text of the standard.

 

 

 

Ok

http://www.packetizer.com/codecs/h264/trev_293-schaefer.pdf

New application areas and business models

 

The increased compression efficiency of H.264/AVC offers new application areas and business opportunities.

It is now possible, to transmit video signals at about 1 Mbit/s with TV (PAL) quality, which enables streaming

over xDSL connections. Another interesting business area is TV transmission over satellite. By choosing 8-

PSK and turbo coding (as currently under discussion for DVB-S2) and the usage of H.264/AVC, the number of

programmes per satellite can be tripled in comparison to the current DVB-S systems using MPEG-2. Given

this huge amount of additional transmission capacity, even the exchange of existing set-top boxes might

become an interesting option.

 

Also for DVB-T, H.264/AVC is an interesting option. Assuming the transmission parameters which have been

selected for Germany (8k mode, 16-QAM, code rate 2/3, and ¼ Guard Interval), a bitrate of 13.27 Mbit/s is

available in each 8 MHz channel.   

 

It now becomes possible to encode HD

signals at about 8 Mbit/s which fit onto a conventional DVD.

In October 2002, UBVideo [10] showed (for the H.264/AVC Baseline profile) CIF-resolution video running

on a 800 MHz Pentium 3 laptop computer. The encoding was at 49 frames per second (fps), decoding at

105 fps, and encoding and decoding together at 33 fps. Their low-complexity encoding solution . which is

designed/optimized for real-time conversational video applications . incurred an increase in bit-rate of

approximately 10% against the rate-distortion performance of the very slow reference software, when encoding

typical video content used in such applications.

 

My conclusion of this is…

By using gobbelikok in text (hiding) and the art of nano slicing switching and degradation in signals without users to see it, it will be possible to transfer data in and out of ATM videosurveilance systems, home computers, videosurveilance systems, wifi and mobile bankingsystems, and also therefore (bellow) no answers will be recived of functionality-declaration-equation scenario, due to the “painting in the business itself in the corner matter stunt need to make money not so honest maybe it works thingi ?

 

Enough?

Market 45 miljon hdtv sets in 2008? Que? Titanic they had no radar also?

 

A simple email kajander1@nodns.org or kajander12345@hotmail.com

japan1.freewebspace.com +portals